海军医学杂志

目的调查不同出海次数和晕船程度医务人员选择抗晕船方法的差异。方法自行设计调查表,对不同出海次数和晕船程度的221名医院船医务人员进行问卷调查。结果男性与女性医务人员在选择抗晕船方法上差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。出海≤5次与>5次的医务人员在选择抗晕船方法上差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。轻度、中度、重度晕船医务人员在选择抗晕船方法上差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论出海次数多和晕船程度轻的医务人员倾向于选择海上适应训练,出海次数少和晕船程度重的医务人员更倾向于选择药物预防。

Objective To survey the difference in the selection of anti-seasickness methods by medical workers aboard the hospital ship,based on the frequencies of deployment at sea and seriousness of seasickness. methods A questionnaire designed specifically for the survey was conducted among the 221 hospital ship medical workers with various frequencies of deployment at sea and seriousness of seasickness. results There was no significant difference in the selection of anti-seasickness methods between male and female medical workers(P>0.05).Significant difference could be seen in the selection of anti-seasickness methods,when a comparison was made between medical workers with deployment at sea for less than 5 times and those with deployment at sea for more than 5 times(P<0.01).And significant difference was shown in the selection of anti-seasickness methods among medical workers with mild,moderate and severe seasickness(P<0.01). conclusion Medical workers with more frequent deployment at sea and with mild seasickness tended to take sea-acclimatization,while those with less frequent deployment at sea and with severe seasickness tended to choose drug prevention.